Skip to content

Evolution of Parliament at ECPR Joint Sessions

Please note that SEDEPE  will host a joint sessions workshop titled the “The Evolution of Parliamentarism and its Political Consequences” at the upcoming 2014 ECPR Joint Sessions in Salamanca, Spain. Workshop directors Hanna Back and Björn Erik Rasch welcome paper proposals. The deadline to submit a paper proposal is December 1, 2014; proposals should be submitted via the ECPR website at

Also note that SEDEPE is organizing a second Joint Sessions workshop on judicial careers in Salamanca. Paper proposals for that workshop can be submitted at

We hope to see you in Spain!

Posted in Conferences.

Upcoming events and deadlines

Please note that there are a number of upcoming events that you may find of interest.

a) The ECPR Joint Sessions will take place in Salamanca Spain in April 2014. The call for papers is now open and SEDEPE is organizing at panel on judicial elites titled “Causes and Consequences of Judicial Selection and Turnover at the Supreme/High Court Level”. For more information please visit The deadline to submit a paper proposal for the Joint Sessions is 1 December, 2013. Questions/queries to Patrick Dumont ( or Matthew Kerby (

b) SEDEPE members will also host a panel on bureaucratic elites at the 2014 IPSA World Congress in Montreal, Canada in July 2014. This panel, organized under the umbrella of RC27: Structure and Organization of Government is titled “Greasy poles towards queasy roles? The politics of selection at the top of ministerial bureaucracies”. The deadline to submit proposals is approaching fast: 29 September, 2013. For more information, or to submit a paper please contact Julia Fleischer (

Posted in Conferences.

Two More Panels of Interest for Bordeaux 2013

SEDEPE Members may want to check out and perhaps send a paper proposal for the following panels at Bordeaux 2013.

Cabinet Politics in Latin America
Chair: Marcelo Camerlo
Discussant: Matthew Kerby

Abstract. The literature on presidential cabinets has made important advances over the last few years, especially in relation to cabinet formation. However, the focus remains on the aggregate level and we still know little about the individuals that compose these cabinets. Who are the ministers? What are their competences? What is their liaison with the president like and what is their external support? How do all these aspects evolve after cabinet formation? To face these questions, this panel welcomes papers that study Latin American ministers on one of the following dimensions. (I) Political affiliation and group support. The recent literature has shown the role of party affiliation on cabinet formation and legislative support. We suggest advancing the identification of non-party affiliations and the evolution of political affiliation during the life cycle of cabinets. (II) Individual trajectories and competences. The common expectation is that ministers should be particularly skilled for the position. We are interested in knowing the type and level of minister competences. (III) The relationship with the president. The president’s inner circle is considered a key component of the presidential decision making process. We suggest studying the relationship between this circle and the whole cabinet, identifying ministers that take part of it, modalities of entry/exit, and decision-making dynamics.




Career Patterns in Multi-Level Systems
Chair: Klaus Stolz

Abstract: Processes of political professionalisation at the local and regional level together with newly established regional and supranational tiers of government have strongly affected the structure of opportunities for professional politicians. Political careers are no longer directed exclusively to the national level (if they ever were). Instead of unidirectional, hierarchically organised career ladders with a clear (national) apex, political careers may be pursued in different territorial arenas, linked in different ways. With some time lag, scholars of political careers are currently beginning to come to terms with the multi-level character of political systems. Yet while some old conventional assumptions have been rightly relegated to the dustbin, they have not yet been replaced by new certainties about the complex pathways political careers may take.

What different multi-level pathways can be found? How can we best identify these newly emerging career patterns? How can we account for the huge variance across regions and countries? Do these different career patterns matter? Questions like these have been addressed in recent studies, but they have hardly been solved. In this panel we thus aim to bring together scholars dealing with these questions. Papers might focus on empirical questions, both in traditional federal systems (US, Australia, Canada, Germany etc.) as well as in newly regionalised countries (Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, UK etc.). In addition we strongly encourage scholars to submit papers dealing with theoretical or methodological questions.

Posted in Conferences.

ECPR 2013 Bordeaux Call for Papers

ECPR Bordeaux Conference

Please note that the call for papers for the ECPR General Conference in Bordeaux has begun. The deadline for proposals is 1 February, 2013; SEDEPE members will likely be interested in the following panels organized by ECPR Research Committee 02: Political Elites. Note that a number of the panels will be chaired by SEDEPE members – see below.

Paper proposals can be submitted via the ECPR website at –> events –> general conferences –> Bordeaux 2013 –> Propose a paper.

Hope to see you in France!



3.3 Section on “Elites and Trans-Atlantic Crisis” at the ECPR General Conference in Bordeaux, 4th – 7th September 2013

Abstract: Discussion of the trans-Atlantic crisis is rife with allusions to elites and elitism. Policy failures by elites are widely perceived as main causes of the crisis, and bold elite actions are viewed as essential if it is to be allayed. At no time since Pareto completed his Treatise on General Sociology a hundred years ago have elites been more prominent in public discourse than at present. Although elitism continues to be denounced as a cancer in the corpus of democratic politics, it is apparent that amid crisis elites must act decisively as guardians of democratic practices and procedures. It may not be too much to say that the elite perspective is gaining traction from the trans-Atlantic crisis, at the same time that the crisis affords an opportunity to sharpen the analysis of elites and elitism. The panels of the proposed section are supposed to explore these possibilities. Panels using a comparative perspective are especially welcome.

The section will include the following panels:

1. Patrick Dumont and Hanna Bäck: Elite Turnover in Times of Crisis
The link between economic-financial crises and electoral results is a topic addressed by retrospective voting and more specifically economic voting theories. Whether electoral results are followed by government change (wholesale or partial turnover in party composition, change of Prime minister) is yet another question in multi-party systems where coalition governments are needed to reach a majority in parliament. Electoral responsiveness and accountability of incumbents are at the core of this panel which seeks to address various types of government turnover and their link with economic- financial crises. Paper proposals analyzing government turnover are here welcome. Is this turnover indeed greater in times of crisis, reflecting either great electoral swings or greater attention on the part of elites to electoral results? What explains instances of incumbent Prime ministers not even standing for re-election? When incumbents are able to come back to power, do we observe changes in ministerial personnel? These are, among others, research questions we hope to tackle and discuss in the proposed panel.

2. Ursula Hoffmann-Lange and Kai-Uwe Schnapp: Elite Theory and Empirical Elite Research Amid Trans- Atlantic Crisis
While classic and modern elite theories primarily focus on the aggregate level and discuss the structure, functions and quality of elites in a general way, empirical elite research analyzes individual-level data on elites. Empirical elite studies, moreover, have dealt mostly with single national elites, longitudinally or by comparing different elite sectors. Comparative elite studies have been rare and mostly limited to parliamentarians, political executives and top civil servants. Their theoretical focus has necessarily been limited. Rather than discussing elites in a general way, they have used theories of social mobility or theories of representation to explain the social backgrounds and political outlooks of elites and have analyzed changes within the elites or in the relationship between them and citizens by relating them to broader societal developments such as modernization or democratization. However, the increasing availability of data generated by empirical elite research (both cross-sectional and longitudinal) facilitates a search for empirical regularities that transcend individual nations. Meta analyses comparing the results of national elite studies can be used to test broader theoretical questions about the structure and quality of elites. For example, democratization in the CEE countries has elicited a large number of empirical studies bearing on the formation or breakdown of elite settlements. The current economic-political crisis in the trans-Atlantic world affords opportunities to test which economic, institutional and political conditions may be polarizing national elites and undermining the consensus that has characterized elites in many countries in Europe and North America since the 1950s. The panel invites papers dealing with the meta-theoretical question of how the gap between elite theory and empirical elite research may be narrowed in light of the crisis, as well as papers demonstrating theoretical implications of research on elites in the face of crisis (e.g. elite recruitment, attitudes and networks).

3. John Higley and Jan Pakulski: Political Leadership in Times of Crisis
It is clear that political leaders play a central and prominent role in contemporary democracies. Leaders are seen not only as key decision-makers who dominate state executives and shape government strategies, but also as the key elite integrators, the main public communicators of government actions, and the principal repositories of public trust and confidence. At perhaps no time has this centrality of leaders been more evident than during the ongoing trans-Atlantic economic-political crisis. Laments about the inadequacy of national and supra-national leaders have been equaled in number only by demands that they act more decisively. The crisis is in many respects a crisis of political leadership. Papers analyzing the roles played and not played by paramount political leaders – prime ministers and presidents, finance ministers, party leaders (including leaders of parties widely seen as ‘extremist’ in their stances), as well as top EU, ECB, IMF, and Federal Reserve leaders – are invited, as are papers that reflect on what the crisis-born successes and failures of these leaders imply for stable democracy in the trans-Atlantic world.

4. Pedro Tavares de Almeida and António Costa Pinto: The Rise of Technocrats: Europe and Latin America in Comparison
This panel aims at outlining and discussing main continuities and changes, as well as diversities and convergences, in political elite recruitment patterns in democratic regimes in Europe and Latin America in the last decades. In particular, papers should elaborate on the increasing role played by technical experts or technocrats in European governments and in Latin American executive and legislative bodies, exploring the variables (institutional, political, economic) that favour it and assessing the consequences of this trend. Papers that deal with relevant case studies or take a comparative approach are welcome.

5. Maurizio Cotta and Heinrich Best: European Elites and the Economic-Political Crisis
The major and prolonged economic-political crisis in Europe presents elites with very serious challenges. The crisis generates significant material losses that affect large parts of European populations. At the same time, it facilitates exceptional advantages and profits, political and economic, for some elites and financial interests. The crisis requires largely unprecedented and painful decisions by elites with governing responsibilities, and their decisions tend strongly to diminish trust in the elites who take them. Above all, containing or resolving the crisis challenges accepted wisdom and requires elites to innovate. This panel invites papers assessing two main questions: (1) Will existing European elites succeed in responding to the crisis? (2) Will the elites undergo significant transformations in the process? the ability of European elites to meet these challenges. Are they able to produce necessary changes?

6. Elena Semenova: Advanced Research Methods for Elite Studies
This panel deals with the methodological aspects of elite studies (see Moyser and Wagstaffe 1987). Depending on the particular field (see Hoffmann-Lange 2007), scholars have used different methods of data collection and analysis. Some quantitative (e.g., OLS and multinominal regression as well as factor and correspondence analysis) and qualitative methods (e.g., narrative interviews, focus groups, and text analysis) have been widely applied in elite studies. Researchers have also recently started to use more advanced methods such as survival analysis, multi-level modeling, network analysis, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), and sequence analysis. We would like to invite empirical papers that focus primarily on elites and that use advanced data analysis methods. Papers should illustrate the benefits of the chosen method for elite research. Possible topics may include elite recruitment, turnover, career patterns, elite structure, and elite-mass distinction. Papers analyzing longitudinal data are particularly welcome.

7. Jonas Wolff, Solveig Richter and Jørgen Møller: Critical Junctures in Democracy Promotion: A new perspective on the role of external actors in processes of regime change
Processes of regime change have proven much more complex than the ‘transition paradigm’ had led us to expect. While producing quite diverse results, they arguably have a long-term impact on the institutional set-up and the socio-political power relations of the country at hand. In this sense, they constitute key episodes of political change which can be analyzed as critical junctures. This panel sets out to use the historical institutional concept of critical junctures in order to develop a new perspective on international democracy promotion. Instead of the linear view that analyzes democracy promotion in terms of its effect on the success or failure of transition processes, the notion of critical junctures allows for democracy promotion to have multiple effects on political development in the ‘recipient’ country. By engaging in (or supporting the emergence of) critical junctures, external democracy promoters might, for instance, help shape domestic political struggle in a way that sets a country on a path towards ‘delegative’ democracy or towards (some kind of) ‘hybrid’ regime. Systematically, the panel will deal with the following questions: (1) To what extent and in what way do democracy promoters engage in producing critical junctures in ‘target’ countries? (2) How do democracy promoters perceive, react to and interact with ‘local’ actors in critical junctures? (3) What consequences do different activities of external actors in critical junctures have for the political development in the ‘target’ countries?

Posted in Conferences.

Tagged with , .

2013 ECPR General Conference (Bordeaux) Call for Panel Proposals

Panel proposals are currently being accepted for the 2013 ECPR General Conference, which will take place in Bordeaux , France. Section 13: Elites and the Transatlantic Crisis may interest SEDEPE members.

Posted in Conferences.

2013 ECPR Joint Sessions Call for Papers

SEDEPE members are encouraged to submit paper proposals for the upcoming 2013 European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions which will take place in Mainz, Germany. In particular, SEDEPE members may find Workshop 19: Political Parties and the Recruitment of Appointed Elites in Contemporary Democracies to be of particular interest.

Posted in Conferences.

Upcoming SEDEPE Workshop on Subnational Elites

SEDEPE will meet in Montreal, Canada in October for a SSHRC-funded workshop on subnational elite turnover. Let us know if you are organizing a workshop, meeting or conference on a SEDEPE related theme and we can help spread the word on and via the SEDEPE email bulletin.

Posted in Conferences.

SEDEPE in at IPSA 2012

SEDEPE members recently met in Madrid during the 2012 IPSA World Congress. A number of papers were presented at panels which focused on subnational political elites as well as elite circulation more generally.



Posted in Uncategorized.

Accounting for Ministers

Congratulations to Samuel Berlinski, Torun Dewan and Keith Dowding, who recently published Accounting for Ministers with Cambridge University Press. Please note that if you or your colleagues have recently published research on political elites which is of interest to SEDEPE members then let us know so we can post an announcement on the SEDEPE website (

Posted in Research.

Asociación Latinoamericana de Ciencia Política (ALACIP): Quito, Equador (June 13-15)

Marcelo Camerlo (University of Lisbon) tells us that there are two SEDEPE-related panels at the upcoming ALACIP Congress in Equador.

For more info:

Asociación Latinoamericana de Ciencia Política (ALACIP): Quito, (June 13-15)

Panel 245: Ministros y Gabinetes Presidenciales I,  Virtual Room, Wednesday, June 13 12:00 pm-13:30 pm.

Panel 288: Ministros y Gabinetes Presidenciales II,  Room 202, Wednesday, June 13 15:00 pm-16:45 pm (

Posted in Conferences.